Wired – Google is taking some heat this morning from a Wall Street Journal piece that argues the company is abandoning its support of network neutrality in an attempt to make sites like YouTube faster than the competition.
The WSJ claims Google has approached major internet service providers “with a proposal to create a fast lane for its own content.”
That would seem to fly in the face of the company’s long-standing support for network neutrality, but Google has called the WSJ’s article “confused,” and says that it remains committed to network neutrality.
But with more and more desirable results from at least order generic cialis 80% of the users claiming positive results and good response (coupled with no disastrous side effects or allergies) more and more doctors learning about HIFU. One just needs to consume as it is prescribed before the levitra properien http://raindogscine.com/tag/caddies/ lovemaking session. visit description now order cheap levitra This medication may rarely cause a severe intestinal condition (Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea) due to a type of resistant bacteria. cialis buy uk Communicate with your children about becoming safer and smarter drivers. The contention comes from the varying definitions of network neutrality. The simplest version of network neutrality says all internet traffic should delivered at the same speed over the same network. Unfortunately for supporters of the everything-is-absolutely-equal version of network neutrality, the concept has always been an ideal, more of a myth than reality.
The problem lies with what are known as content delivery networks (CDNs) that use so-called edge servers, located physically closer to you, to cache and deliver content faster. When you request the content from, in this case YouTube, it can be transmitted from the proposed edge servers rather than from Google’s central servers.
