" sc13 remote " installed PC , won't have remote for PC-Doctor computer ?

[BleuOisou]

" sc13 remote "  installed PC , won't have remote for PC-Doctor computer  ?

"sc13 remote "  PCD-004126-2020-03-04 //PCD-004134-2020-03-09 no replies , no phone number , on waiting ...?
"sc13 remote " unfounded steps instructions of Archive history , report by pdf, cases emails conversion   .

2ND opened [PCD-004134-2020-03-09]  complex network thing that Right email not reached to my endpoint ?  1st before answered completed closed . Mar 04 2020 bought sc13 remote yet get right instruction daily ?  An suspicion not genial app installed at the m93p maliciously changed Bois adm password,   IPv6 working at subnet ,  win10pro  auto in win10 enterprise ,  dhcpv6duid modified failure no solved by Mar 2018 from Microsoft  today .... ?

None such subnet mac.ether changed motherboard according to RCF3315 under controlling , or instruction its impacting in charger of by from nowhere since 2011 to today . . .


Sincerely

[BleuOisou]

            - Intel management engine interface being warned
            - BIOS adm maliciously changed , unable update the newest from myself , there  OEM is Nov. 2019 files at store.
            - device manager forcing adm control of initial dhcpv6duid that local and v6DUID twin , overlook the  2nd eth.mac of changed motherboard 
              on this machine.
            - Win10pro with updating ... it is win10 enterprise under Microsoft ?  Feature, control management etc., is in a novel .
            - Two prefixes IPv6 shown under ipcfg,  vista.tunnel adapter having one Network 2002:... , isp assigned claimed as 2404:... only ,
            - Switch setting no RouteIPv6,  two prefixes as prefixes set at ,

            - etc.

sc13 remote working under such environment can report correctly ?
             - sc 13 won't detect subnet of two mac.eth ?
             - sc 13 don't care OS system
             - sc 13 won't be able to find real network users ?


Mar 04 2020 purchased , installed at mar 06 2020 could not have history set well from none instructions or pdf ?

Is the remote sc being MIM (man in middle) hacked as multiple networks between ISP and endpoint , which sc remote reporting everything fine without errors ?

Sincerely